From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [7241] qemu: refactor main_loop (Marcelo Tosatti)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:55:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F7894B.7080103@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090428224149.GA15512@amt.cnet>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4080 bytes --]
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:34:55AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> Revision: 7241
>>> http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=qemu&revision=7241
>>> Author: aliguori
>>> Date: 2009-04-24 18:03:33 +0000 (Fri, 24 Apr 2009)
>>> Log Message:
>>> -----------
>>> qemu: refactor main_loop (Marcelo Tosatti)
>>>
>>> Break main loop into 3 main functions.
>> I suspect this patch comes with a race between SIGALRM and
>> qemu_calculate_timeout() so that I see occasional freezes of exactly 5
>> seconds if the IO thread is disabled.
>
> host_alarm_handler writes to the notification fd (via
> qemu_event_increment), which should cause the select() to exit
> immediately, even if a pending timer was not taken into account by
> qemu_calculate_timeout().
Yeah, now I remember. And I always wondered why my strace logs reported
that writing to that file descriptor failed. I should have looked closer
into this immediately... (patch will follow 8) )
>
> But 5 seconds is a good clue :)
>
>> I do not yet understand what
>> happens precisely or if this patch only widens an already existing race
>> window in the old code, but I'm on it.
>>
>> Besides that...
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> Modified Paths:
>>> --------------
>>> trunk/vl.c
>>>
>>> Modified: trunk/vl.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- trunk/vl.c 2009-04-24 18:03:29 UTC (rev 7240)
>>> +++ trunk/vl.c 2009-04-24 18:03:33 UTC (rev 7241)
>>> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@
>>>
>>> static CPUState *cur_cpu;
>>> static CPUState *next_cpu;
>>> -static int event_pending = 1;
>>> +static int timer_alarm_pending = 1;
>>> /* Conversion factor from emulated instructions to virtual clock ticks. */
>>> static int icount_time_shift;
>>> /* Arbitrarily pick 1MIPS as the minimum allowable speed. */
>>> @@ -1360,7 +1360,7 @@
>>> }
>>> #endif
>>> }
>>> - event_pending = 1;
>>> + timer_alarm_pending = 1;
>>> qemu_notify_event();
>>> }
>>> }
>>> @@ -3879,153 +3879,175 @@
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static int main_loop(void)
>>> +static int qemu_cpu_exec(CPUState *env)
>>> {
>>> - int ret, timeout;
>>> + int ret;
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PROFILER
>>> int64_t ti;
>>> #endif
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROFILER
>>> + ti = profile_getclock();
>>> +#endif
>>> + if (use_icount) {
>>> + int64_t count;
>>> + int decr;
>>> + qemu_icount -= (env->icount_decr.u16.low + env->icount_extra);
>>> + env->icount_decr.u16.low = 0;
>>> + env->icount_extra = 0;
>>> + count = qemu_next_deadline();
>>> + count = (count + (1 << icount_time_shift) - 1)
>>> + >> icount_time_shift;
>>> + qemu_icount += count;
>>> + decr = (count > 0xffff) ? 0xffff : count;
>>> + count -= decr;
>>> + env->icount_decr.u16.low = decr;
>>> + env->icount_extra = count;
>>> + }
>>> + ret = cpu_exec(env);
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROFILER
>>> + qemu_time += profile_getclock() - ti;
>>> +#endif
>>> + if (use_icount) {
>>> + /* Fold pending instructions back into the
>>> + instruction counter, and clear the interrupt flag. */
>>> + qemu_icount -= (env->icount_decr.u16.low
>>> + + env->icount_extra);
>>> + env->icount_decr.u32 = 0;
>>> + env->icount_extra = 0;
>>> + }
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int cpu_has_work(CPUState *env)
>> ...this naming is suboptimal. There is already cpu_has_work() in
>> target-*/exec.h which is at least confusing. Please rename.
>
> Well its static. What name do you prefer (can't find a better name
> really). do_cpu_exec?
>
Yes, it works, but it doesn't help reading the code. Also: tcg_has_work
- isn't kvm also running through this?
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-24 18:03 [Qemu-devel] [7241] qemu: refactor main_loop (Marcelo Tosatti) Anthony Liguori
2009-04-28 22:34 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2009-04-28 22:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-04-28 22:55 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2009-04-28 23:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-04-29 7:18 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-04-29 7:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-04-29 9:47 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49F7894B.7080103@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).