From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LzaKg-0000Ad-NL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:46:02 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LzaKa-00008N-W0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:46:02 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43257 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LzaKa-00008H-SP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:45:56 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:48611) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LzaKa-00039W-AV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:45:56 -0400 Message-ID: <49F9E3CB.4000604@web.de> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:45:47 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1239812969-8320-2-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com> <200904291137.57852.paul@codesourcery.com> <49F9AB7C.7020803@redhat.com> <200904301702.32282.paul@codesourcery.com> <49F9D2B3.60707@us.ibm.com> <49F9DBCC.3030906@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <49F9DBCC.3030906@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig59862592F8309B529426600E" Sender: jan.kiszka@web.de Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 9/9] Introduce VLANClientState::cleanup() List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Mark McLoughlin , Marcelo Tosatti , Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Blue Swirl , Avi Kivity , Paul Brook This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig59862592F8309B529426600E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Anthony Liguori wrote: > Blue Swirl wrote: >> On 4/30/09, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> -net pointopoint,tap,nic,model=3Dvirtio ? >> =20 >=20 > Or perhaps: >=20 > -net tap,vlan=3Doff,id=3D1234 -net nic,model=3Dvirtio,vlan=3Doff,id=3D1= 234 >=20 That would only allow one such pair per VM. Why not keeping all the existing infrastructure, just locking a vlan against becoming more than a point-to-point link once some conflicting optimization was applied? That should be easy to implement and to explain to the user. Jan --------------enig59862592F8309B529426600E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkn549AACgkQniDOoMHTA+kQ/QCghF2xwADmvhz0qONR0ain5/sY 8DEAn3N7Im+xY/3tfceqyBOFFdmsq/nt =/p9H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig59862592F8309B529426600E--