From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LzciA-0005cd-QF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:18:26 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lzci7-0005bD-2X
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:18:26 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56281 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lzci6-0005b9-RS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:18:22 -0400
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:34124)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <dlaor@redhat.com>) id 1Lzchz-0000ex-VN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:18:22 -0400
Message-ID: <49FA0788.5000809@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:18:16 +0300
From: Dor Laor <dlaor@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Change the virtio-block storage class to
	PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_SCSI
References: <49F9F86C.3000009@redhat.com> <20090430200901.GA30530@lst.de>
In-Reply-To: <20090430200901.GA30530@lst.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: dlaor@redhat.com
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:13:48PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
>   
>> Windows virtio driver cannot pass DTM (certification) tests
>> while the storage class is PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_UNKNOWN.
>>     
>
> Well, it isn't scsi so this is wrong.  Tell these certification people
> to fix their test.
>   
It's also not unknown... someone I know implemented scsi pass through so 
it is
more close to scsi than to unknown..
These certification people are M$ so it is simpler to do this harmless 
change instead
of waiting some light years.