qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] PATCH: enabling TCP keepalives - v3
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 10:11:48 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49FB1F44.3080004@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905011704.48102.paul@codesourcery.com>



Paul Brook wrote:
>> I don't think an option is very useful.  If you lose your connection and
>> now have a bunch of orphan connections, it's too late to have the
>> foresight to have used an option on startup.  In that case, it would be
>> much better to just be able to close existing connections.
>>
>> I think there's a very, very small number of people that would have the
>> foresight to always use keepalive=60 or whatever the option would be.
> 
> In that case we should do nothing. Users with a flakey net connection can 
> tweak their kernel (via /proc/sys) to use lower timeouts. AFAICS There's no 
> way qemu can know what a "better" value is. As a concrete example my ADSL 
> connection takes between 90 and 180 seconds to resync after a noise spike, so 
> 60 seconds is absolutely the wrong timeout value here.
> 
> Paul

ie., just enable keepalives and use OS defaults? The linux default is
7200 seconds to start sending probes (which is 2 hours as Avi noted, not
7 hours as I misstated).

I'll send an updated patch.

david

      reply	other threads:[~2009-05-01 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-30 19:40 [Qemu-devel] PATCH: enabling TCP keepalives - v3 David Ahern
2009-05-01 11:32 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2009-05-01 12:23   ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-01 12:49   ` David Ahern
2009-05-01 15:23     ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-05-01 15:47       ` David Ahern
2009-05-01 17:21         ` Richard W.M. Jones
2009-05-05  1:31         ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05  2:59           ` David Ahern
2009-05-01 15:52       ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-01 16:11         ` John Haxby
2009-05-05  1:35           ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-01 14:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-01 14:47   ` David Ahern
2009-05-01 14:51     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-01 15:16       ` Paul Brook
2009-05-01 15:57         ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-01 16:04           ` Paul Brook
2009-05-01 16:11             ` David Ahern [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49FB1F44.3080004@gmail.com \
    --to=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).