From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] PATCH: enabling TCP keepalives - v3
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 10:11:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49FB1F44.3080004@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905011704.48102.paul@codesourcery.com>
Paul Brook wrote:
>> I don't think an option is very useful. If you lose your connection and
>> now have a bunch of orphan connections, it's too late to have the
>> foresight to have used an option on startup. In that case, it would be
>> much better to just be able to close existing connections.
>>
>> I think there's a very, very small number of people that would have the
>> foresight to always use keepalive=60 or whatever the option would be.
>
> In that case we should do nothing. Users with a flakey net connection can
> tweak their kernel (via /proc/sys) to use lower timeouts. AFAICS There's no
> way qemu can know what a "better" value is. As a concrete example my ADSL
> connection takes between 90 and 180 seconds to resync after a noise spike, so
> 60 seconds is absolutely the wrong timeout value here.
>
> Paul
ie., just enable keepalives and use OS defaults? The linux default is
7200 seconds to start sending probes (which is 2 hours as Avi noted, not
7 hours as I misstated).
I'll send an updated patch.
david
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-01 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-30 19:40 [Qemu-devel] PATCH: enabling TCP keepalives - v3 David Ahern
2009-05-01 11:32 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2009-05-01 12:23 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-01 12:49 ` David Ahern
2009-05-01 15:23 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-05-01 15:47 ` David Ahern
2009-05-01 17:21 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2009-05-05 1:31 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 2:59 ` David Ahern
2009-05-01 15:52 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-01 16:11 ` John Haxby
2009-05-05 1:35 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-01 14:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-01 14:47 ` David Ahern
2009-05-01 14:51 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-01 15:16 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-01 15:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-01 16:04 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-01 16:11 ` David Ahern [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49FB1F44.3080004@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).