From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0YZp-0001vu-Fb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 06:05:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0YZi-0001up-Hb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 06:05:38 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48122 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M0YZg-0001ue-5c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 06:05:33 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:44710) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M0YZf-0003se-EG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 06:05:31 -0400 Message-ID: <49FD6C67.8000107@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 13:05:27 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20090501211717.24514.23246.stgit@mchn012c.ww002.siemens.net> <20090501211720.24514.67620.stgit@mchn012c.ww002.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: <20090501211720.24514.67620.stgit@mchn012c.ww002.siemens.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/8] kvm: Rework dirty bitmap synchronization List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Jan Kiszka wrote: > Extend kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap() so that is can sync across > multiple slots. Useful for updating the whole dirty log during > migration. Moreover, properly pass down errors the whole call chain. > > > -void cpu_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap(target_phys_addr_t start_addr, target_phys_addr_t end_addr); > +int cpu_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap(target_phys_addr_t start_addr, > + target_phys_addr_t end_addr); > > This is defined in terms of physical addresses, but in patch 5, you > @@ -3248,13 +3248,18 @@ static int ram_save_live(QEMUFile *f, int stage, void *opaque) > { > ram_addr_t addr; > > + if (cpu_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap(0, last_ram_offset) != 0) { > + qemu_file_set_error(f); > + return 0; > + } > + > Which is in terms of ram addresses; so this will fail with large memory, where the last phys address is larger than the last ram address. Maybe this can be as easy as passing -1 for the end address. But in this case I suggest adding a helper to sync all of memory instead. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function