From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M12mW-0000lz-5T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 14:20:48 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M12mQ-0000iE-BD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 14:20:46 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54744 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M12mQ-0000i0-4D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 14:20:42 -0400 Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.159]:36871) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M12mP-0006zw-Q1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 14:20:41 -0400 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e38.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n44II3Ko032308 for ; Mon, 4 May 2009 12:18:03 -0600 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n44IKMpW199114 for ; Mon, 4 May 2009 12:20:23 -0600 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n44IKLdf012538 for ; Mon, 4 May 2009 12:20:22 -0600 Received: from squirrel.codemonkey.ws (sig-9-76-198-10.mts.ibm.com [9.76.198.10]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n44IKLvD012493 for ; Mon, 4 May 2009 12:20:21 -0600 Message-ID: <49FF31E4.8040106@us.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 13:20:20 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Does anyone actually use -smb List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" It looks to be broken. I don't recall that Samba has every supported running as an unprivileged user to so it would require launching as root. Would anyone be opposed to removing this? -- Regards, Anthony Liguori