From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M14jD-0001D6-51 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 16:25:31 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M14j8-00010l-Kh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 16:25:30 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35353 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M14j8-00010P-BE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 16:25:26 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:57842) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M14j7-0002T7-RV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 16:25:26 -0400 Message-ID: <49FF4F33.7040408@web.de> Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 22:25:23 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <49FF31E4.8040106@us.ibm.com> <49FF4DC2.4020003@web.de> In-Reply-To: <49FF4DC2.4020003@web.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0265DE05CD18764F2B98E68E" Sender: jan.kiszka@web.de Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Does anyone actually use -smb List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0265DE05CD18764F2B98E68E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jan Kiszka wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: >> It looks to be broken. I don't recall that Samba has every supported >> running as an unprivileged user to so it would require launching as ro= ot. >=20 > It works perfectly. I even have a patch pending that fixes the zombie > issue it causes (more precisely, slirp missed that). >=20 >> Would anyone be opposed to removing this? >> >=20 > No reason to do so IMHO. It's very simple to use, much simpler than > having to configure a full samba server on the host, which would includ= e > user/password management. >=20 > Jan >=20 BTW, I'm sitting on a large rework of all the slirp-related command line options + a fully-configurable slirp (not yet multi-instance, but that may come as well). Is your question motivated by some slirp-affecting work, or just cleanup considerations? Jan --------------enig0265DE05CD18764F2B98E68E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkn/TzMACgkQniDOoMHTA+nb2gCfbsiEj5QltvAU8pzXEObRbzsh ThoAnjpAnqiT/1gyC79lz57HFeynAEgV =Qgp0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0265DE05CD18764F2B98E68E--