qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Stuart Brady <stuart.brady@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] suppress 'warn_unused_result' warning
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 11:16:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A084F58.7030706@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090511154226.GA29818@miranda.arrow>

Stuart Brady wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 07:53:35PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>   
>> When a signal is received and you are waiting for data, you get
>> EINTR.  If there's data available, then I believe the behavior is to
>> return that data and not EINTR.  That's the way Unix works.
>>     
>
> So if I do a read() from a file over NFS, and there's an awful lot of
> latency (and perhaps even connection problems), and the process gets a
> signal -- does that mean that the signal will only be delivered once
> data is returned?
>
> If not, then I would really start to wonder whether /all/ code dealing
> with read(), write(), etc. should be written to cope with EINTR (and 
> also partial reads/writes?) regardless of whatever is done with threads
> and signal masks, as doing otherwise seems only to be asking for trouble
> at some point.  (I'd be especially concerned about signals intended for
> libraries that are not under the developer's control...)
>   

Any system call can return EINTR just about.  It's not just read/write.

In general, very few systems handle EINTR completely and QEMU is no 
exception here.

More should because SIGHUP is fairly common but I think that for the 
most part, it's sufficiently rare that it's not a problem for most projects.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-11 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-10 19:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] suppress 'warn_unused_result' warning Chih-Min Chao
2009-05-10 22:11 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-10 22:15 ` Stuart Brady
2009-05-10 23:19   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-11  1:53   ` M. Warner Losh
2009-05-11 15:42     ` Stuart Brady
2009-05-11 16:02       ` Paul Brook
2009-05-11 16:16       ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-05-11 16:25         ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-05-11 16:57           ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-12 12:19             ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-11 17:02       ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-11 16:15 ` Daniel P. Berrange

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A084F58.7030706@codemonkey.ws \
    --to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stuart.brady@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).