From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M3daK-0006XU-2d
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 18:02:56 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M3daF-0006Wh-0l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 18:02:55 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38819 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M3daE-0006We-Th
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 18:02:50 -0400
Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:34589)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <aliguori@us.ibm.com>) id 1M3daE-0001Lz-Bo
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2009 18:02:50 -0400
Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com
	[9.17.195.227])
	by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n4BLx5eJ021109
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 11 May 2009 15:59:05 -0600
Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168])
	by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id
	n4BM2nce232396
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 11 May 2009 16:02:49 -0600
Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id
	n4BM2moh018902
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 11 May 2009 16:02:48 -0600
Message-ID: <4A08A087.9050708@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 17:02:47 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] Add module infrastructure to QEMU
References: <1242052009-27339-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com>
	<1242052009-27339-2-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com>
	<20090511215325.GB18336@game.jcrosoft.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090511215325.GB18336@game.jcrosoft.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> +#ifndef QEMU_MODULE_H
>> +#define QEMU_MODULE_H
>> +
>> +#define module_init(function, priority)                                  \
>> +static void __attribute__((constructor)) qemu_init_ ## function(void) {  \
>> +   register_module_init(function, priority);                             \
>> +}
>>     
> why not use the constructor priority?
>   

We're just using constructors to register our real constructors so 
priority wouldn't really help us in the gcc constructors.

> Best Regards,
> J.
>   


-- 
Regards,

Anthony Liguori