From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M5lhf-0002i8-UL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 15:07:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M5lhb-0002hh-9J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 15:07:19 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54931 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M5lhb-0002hd-40 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 15:07:15 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:46420) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M5lha-0005Q5-8d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 15:07:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4A106057.1090709@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 22:07:03 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add GPL bios as a submodule References: <1242574141-18488-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <1242574141-18488-2-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <4A103084.2000508@redhat.com> <4A1031F4.4050401@us.ibm.com> <4A1039EB.4070906@redhat.com> <20090517175126.GA13426@shareable.org> <000001c9d71a$1a448730$4ecd9590$@com> <4A105358.80605@redhat.com> <000101c9d71e$8888fec0$999afc40$@com> In-Reply-To: <000101c9d71e$8888fec0$999afc40$@com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stanislav Cc: 'Anthony Liguori' , 'Dustin Kirkland' , 'Glauber Costa' , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, 'Alex Graf' Stanislav wrote: > >> Doesn't Coreboot use seabios for legacy OS? >> > > No idea ... > From the FAQ: > > What is coreboot? > > It performs just a little bit of hardware initialization and then > executes a so-called payload . > > Some of the many possible payloads are: a Linux > kernel, FILO > (a GRUB-like bootloader for booting > from disk), GRUB2 , Open Firmware > , Etherboot > /GPXE > , SeaBIOS > (for booting Windows XP, Windows > Vista, Windows 7, NetBSD and Linux), and many others > . > So it seems to make little sense to load coreboot just to load seabios. Of course I'd like to see coreboot supported, but seabios looks like a better primary target. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.