From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M79iu-0001WM-Hj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2009 10:58:20 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M79ip-0001UE-3N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2009 10:58:19 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48431 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M79io-0001U9-Qr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2009 10:58:14 -0400
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:35442)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1M79io-0000Lf-76
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2009 10:58:14 -0400
Message-ID: <4A156C02.5050604@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 17:58:10 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] augment info migrate with page status
References: <1242861605-12844-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com>
	<20090521140504.GA10055@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090521140504.GA10055@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>, aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 07:20:05PM -0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>   
>> This patch augments info migrate output with status about:
>> * pages remaining
>> * pages transferred
>>     
>
> Could you add 'pages total' and/or possibly 'page size', so apps 
> using this can more easily do calculations, without having to worry
> about hardcoding page sizes for each architecture they deal with. 
>
> Oh, what happens if the guest is backed by huge pages ? Does the
> 'pages transferred' always count in terms of 4k pages, even if
> 2 M & 1 GB pages are in use ?
>   

We should just use bytes.  I don't see how backing page size matters.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function