From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M8c5G-0005yz-Nd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 11:27:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M8c5B-0005wV-4e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 11:27:25 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47231 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M8c59-0005wI-KN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 11:27:20 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:44208) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M8c59-0001UD-5t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 11:27:19 -0400 Message-ID: <4A1AB8CD.1040701@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 18:27:09 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Do we need CONFIG_AIO? References: <20090525082151.GA4107@lst.de> <4A1A85B4.3060200@eu.citrix.com> <20090525133554.GA16351@fries.net> <4A1AA162.1050403@redhat.com> <20090525152447.GA16679@fries.net> In-Reply-To: <20090525152447.GA16679@fries.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: todd@fries.net Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Christoph Hellwig , Stefano Stabellini Todd T. Fries wrote: >> Qemu's CONFIG_AIO requires thread support from the host, not posix aio >> support. >> > > If thats the way things work, great. I just recall when AIO made its debut > in qemu we had to figure out some strange workarounds.. > Things have changed, mostly due to EGLIBC's crappy aio implementation. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function