From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M9b7a-0006ll-VC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 04:37:55 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M9b7V-0006dg-OM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 04:37:54 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36581 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M9b7V-0006dP-Dy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 04:37:49 -0400 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.144]:34543) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M9b7U-0008Si-Vi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 04:37:49 -0400 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n4S8XGdb007845 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 04:33:16 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n4S8blw7246600 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 04:37:47 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n4S8bll0032681 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 04:37:47 -0400 Message-ID: <4A1E4D58.5040307@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:37:44 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Moving keymaps -> pc-bios/keymaps References: <4A1E481F.1060207@us.ibm.com> <20090528083220.GU5809@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <20090528083220.GU5809@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Samuel Thibault Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Samuel Thibault wrote: > Anthony Liguori, le Thu 28 May 2009 03:15:27 -0500, a =E9crit : > =20 >> I've renamed keymaps -> pc-bios/keymaps. This is not a wonderful thin= g >> but it has some advantages like enabling easier automated testing. >> >> If anyone wants to take a stab at a more logical layout (potentially >> including changing the install layout), I think that would be a great = thing. >> =20 > > Could qemu perhaps just use xkb data? > =20 We could but we would probably want to keep it in the tree for Windows and non-X11 targets. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Samuel > =20