From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M9c8W-00073L-6Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 05:42:56 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M9c8R-00070c-7E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 05:42:55 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52734 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M9c8Q-00070W-W4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 05:42:51 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.153]:52253) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M9c8Q-0006Sx-K1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 05:42:50 -0400 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n4S9aGH1020106 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 03:36:16 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n4S9gmrA255200 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 03:42:48 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n4S9gmAA010953 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 03:42:48 -0600 Message-ID: <4A1E5C94.8060807@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:42:44 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Moving keymaps -> pc-bios/keymaps References: <4A1E481F.1060207@us.ibm.com> <4A1E59E3.3090407@mail.berlios.de> In-Reply-To: <4A1E59E3.3090407@mail.berlios.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Stefan Weil wrote: > Anthony Liguori schrieb: > >> Hi, >> >> I've renamed keymaps -> pc-bios/keymaps. This is not a wonderful thing >> but it has some advantages like enabling easier automated testing. >> >> If anyone wants to take a stab at a more logical layout (potentially >> including changing the install layout), I think that would be a great thing. >> >> Regards, >> >> Anthony Liguori >> > > > Renaming pc-bios -> bios would be a little bit more logical, > because QEMU's PC-only versions are history. > This is a contentious topic which I purposefully avoided in order to allow a more thorough flame^W debate about what would be appropriate. Regards, Anthony Liguori