From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M9f8P-0000Db-JQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 08:55:01 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M9f8K-00007e-ST for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 08:55:00 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49784 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M9f8K-00007O-HZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 08:54:56 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f176.google.com ([209.85.217.176]:58336) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M9f8K-0001wp-1y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 08:54:56 -0400 Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so16058873gxk.10 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 05:54:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A1E899A.2000104@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 07:54:50 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [GIT PULL] Stable branch update References: <200905271804.n4RI4jAl005875@ns3.rdu.redhat.com> <4A1E38E9.1060604@codemonkey.ws> <20090528115331.GA30777@poweredge.glommer> In-Reply-To: <20090528115331.GA30777@poweredge.glommer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Glauber Costa Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Glauber Costa wrote: > Sure. The only reason I didn't is that none of them are backports > > They're all clean cherry picks. > Maybe a longer git listing then? For patches that I don't pull into stable the first go around, there usually was a reason. Sometimes it's just a mistake on my part but it would be helpful to have enough context to have a proper discussion on the mailing list. I ended up doing a fetch and then looked through each commit. That's good for me, but for others wanting to participate it would be good to have more info on the list. Regards, Anthony Liguori