From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>, Dor Laor <dlaor@redhat.com>,
ajax@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Change virtio-console to PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_OTHER
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 07:56:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A1E8A16.3060101@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905281353.50463.paul@codesourcery.com>
Paul Brook wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 May 2009, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 09:21 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> We need a mechanism to toggle this for both this and virtio-blk. The
>>> reason a toggle is needed is so that 0.11 can create the same device
>>> model as 0.10.
>>>
>> Okay, so the scenario is:
>>
>> - 0.10 guest running on source machine
>>
>> - migrate to dest machine running 0.11
>>
>> - the device model cannot change or the guest OS will get confused
>>
>
> IMHO think the only sane response is "don't do that". Trying to support
> migration between different qemu versions just isn't worth the pain.
>
It is very worth the pain. I consider it a core requirement.
Supporting legacy workloads is an important aspect of virtualization.
If we cannot provide a consistent environment as we evolve over time,
then we cannot support legacy workloads.
It really isn't that hard, it just requires that we exercise care.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Paul
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-28 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-22 17:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Change virtio-console to PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_OTHER Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-24 9:11 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-27 14:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-27 17:42 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-27 22:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-28 9:33 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-28 9:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-28 12:53 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-28 12:56 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-05-28 13:22 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-28 13:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-28 21:45 ` Dor Laor
2009-05-29 9:43 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-29 9:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-31 14:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-29 9:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-29 10:09 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-31 14:47 ` Dor Laor
2009-06-02 8:49 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-06-02 13:08 ` Dor Laor
2009-06-02 13:39 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-31 14:35 ` Dor Laor
2009-06-02 8:49 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-28 13:04 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-05-28 13:19 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-31 18:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-28 13:20 ` Paul Brook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A1E8A16.3060101@us.ibm.com \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ajax@redhat.com \
--cc=dlaor@redhat.com \
--cc=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).