From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M9jGe-0005NX-3I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 13:19:48 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M9jGZ-0005Km-CU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 13:19:47 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39168 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M9jGY-0005Kd-OE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 13:19:42 -0400 Received: from lizzard.sbs.de ([194.138.37.39]:15968) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M9jGY-0000Yx-1n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 13:19:42 -0400 Message-ID: <4A1EC7A8.4000308@siemens.com> Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 19:19:36 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1243523971.4046.206.camel@blaa> <4A1EADB4.2060106@us.ibm.com> <4A1EB2ED.2090901@siemens.com> <20090528170142.GC30777@poweredge.glommer> In-Reply-To: <20090528170142.GC30777@poweredge.glommer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Networking patches queue List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Glauber Costa Cc: Mark McLoughlin , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel Glauber Costa wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 05:51:09PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> Mark McLoughlin wrote: >>>> Hi Anthony, >>>> >>>> Recently, Jan has posted 11 networking patches and I've posted 17, so I >>>> thought I'd push out a tree with these queued up. Perhaps you want to >>>> pull from there? >>>> >>>> Some notes: >>>> >>>> - I've taken the first 6 of Jan's patches, but left 7-11 for now; see >>>> the review comments I just posted. I expect Jan will be able to >>>> fix them up fairly quickly >>>> >>> If the first 6 patches of Jan's series are ready to apply, wouldn't it >>> make sense for him to submit that as a separate series? In the very >>> least, I'd like an Ack from Jan before applying his series partially. >> You have the ack now. I'm very happy that Mark picks this up before it >> started to bitrot too much. >> >> Mark, do you plan more work in this domain in the next time? I would >> have no problems to route my networking related stuff through one >> coordinating tree, e.g. yours. Besides getting my current queue flushed >> I still have >> >> o rework of host_net_redir (requires coordination with Glauber) > How, exactly? By adopting the enhanced hostfwd syntax (allow for host interface binding). And we need to clean interface for removing and listing. And thinking about "info hostfwd" (or whatever), I just realized that "info guestfwd" would be useful too. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux