From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M9mBP-0003Gb-5U
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 16:26:35 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M9mBJ-0003FJ-9i
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 16:26:33 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50110 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M9mBJ-0003FG-3F
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 16:26:29 -0400
Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:36454)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <aliguori@us.ibm.com>) id 1M9mBI-0001RE-0x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 16:26:28 -0400
Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234])
	by e7.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n4SKEj6V007959
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 28 May 2009 16:14:45 -0400
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64])
	by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id
	n4SKQMBZ201660
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 28 May 2009 16:26:22 -0400
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id
	n4SKQMnK002095
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 28 May 2009 16:26:22 -0400
Message-ID: <4A1EF36C.2060902@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 15:26:20 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1243523971.4046.206.camel@blaa> <4A1EADB4.2060106@us.ibm.com>
	<4A1EB2ED.2090901@siemens.com> <1243529841.18588.37.camel@blaa>
In-Reply-To: <1243529841.18588.37.camel@blaa>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Networking patches queue
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
>>  I would
>> have no problems to route my networking related stuff through one
>> coordinating tree, e.g. yours. Besides getting my current queue flushed
>> I still have
>>
>>  o rework of host_net_redir (requires coordination with Glauber)
>>  o multi-instance slirp
>>
>> on my agenda. And maybe more will comes once this is rolled out.
>>     
>
> Cool. We'll see how it goes. Unless Anthony is actually pulling from
> this tree, it's only useful when we have a bunch of inter-dependant
> queued patches.
>   

I'm always happy to pull from trees.  As long as patches have gone to
the list, it no additional work on my part.  If we have a robust test
suite in tree, then trees become very useful in distributing the load. 
Without a good test suite, I have to do a lot of manual tests which
slows down the process.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Cheers,
> Mark.
>
>