From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MA9VK-00015Z-Eo
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 17:20:42 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MA9VF-000151-RZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 17:20:41 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38543 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MA9VF-00014y-M6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 17:20:37 -0400
Received: from fd-2.mailout.artfiles.de ([212.72.187.61]:54826
	helo=mailout.artfiles.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rr@bttr-software.de>) id 1MA9VF-0005im-BU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 17:20:37 -0400
Received: from [77.128.12.115] (helo=[192.168.0.4]) auth=rr@bttr-software.de
	by mailout.artfiles.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.69) id 1MA9V9-0008Th-Kk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 23:20:31 +0200
Message-ID: <4A20519E.1000501@bttr-software.de>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 23:20:30 +0200
From: Robert Riebisch <rr@bttr-software.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Dan-0411 / FIST bug
References: <4A185F9B.6020303@bttr-software.de>	<4A2033B9.4010305@bttr-software.de>
	<5b31733c0905291344t4111d6ccv1fda02c67468397d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5b31733c0905291344t4111d6ccv1fda02c67468397d@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Filip Navara wrote:

> Maybe because nobody knows. I have only briefly looked into the code

OK. I thought, me wasn't worth an answer. ;-(

> and I believe it wasn't intentional and is just some side-effect of
> the implementation. In fact I believe more of the FPU flags are not
> reported correctly.

I wish QEMU having a bug tracking system, e.g., Bugzilla, Trac, or
Mantis, used by many / all people.

Robert Riebisch
-- 
BTTR Software
http://www.bttr-software.de/