From: Dor Laor <dlaor@redhat.com>
To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
ajax@redhat.com, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Change virtio-console to PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_OTHER
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 17:35:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2295CE.309@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1243590193.13990.73.camel@blaa>
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 00:45 +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
>
>
>> Nevertheless, as Anthony states, guest ABI should be rock stable.
>> We should have mechanism (machine conf format++) that will enable us
>> to configure pci addresses, cpuid entries, memory layout, device
>> existence (hpet, virtio-console,..), etc.
>>
>> Anyhow, I did sent a patch to allow virtio block to parametrized class
>> value -
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-05/msg01189.html
>> There wasn't a perfect match with finding the right interface to change
>> it, happy to hear
>> other alternatives if you're not happy with it.
>>
>
> As I said, it's pointless to add something like this if, realistically,
> it will never be used.
>
> So, taking the example of '-drive class=foo' ... a user who runs qemu
> directly would have to know that when she updates from qemu-0.10.x to
> qemu-0.11.x, she needs to use '-drive class=384' for ever more. I find
> it hard to believe anyone will ever do that.
>
'She' is not a user, she is a developer.
Users use management tools like libvirt below.
Running qemu directly is complicated and error prone for
manual/human users.
I just wanted to stress this out, more feedback in the next email.
> Perhaps management tools can hide this complexity? In order to do this
> in libvirt, we'd need to do the following:
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-31 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-22 17:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Change virtio-console to PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_OTHER Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-24 9:11 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-27 14:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-27 17:42 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-27 22:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-28 9:33 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-28 9:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-28 12:53 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-28 12:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-28 13:22 ` Paul Brook
2009-05-28 13:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-28 21:45 ` Dor Laor
2009-05-29 9:43 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-29 9:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-31 14:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-29 9:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-29 10:09 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-31 14:47 ` Dor Laor
2009-06-02 8:49 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-06-02 13:08 ` Dor Laor
2009-06-02 13:39 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-31 14:35 ` Dor Laor [this message]
2009-06-02 8:49 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-28 13:04 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-05-28 13:19 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-31 18:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-28 13:20 ` Paul Brook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A2295CE.309@redhat.com \
--to=dlaor@redhat.com \
--cc=ajax@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).