From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MBQGd-0003KU-Te for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:26:47 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MBQGc-0003JL-4J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:26:47 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58170 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MBQGb-0003J9-TB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:26:45 -0400 Received: from relay2.mail.masterhost.ru ([83.222.23.62]:32090) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MBQGb-0001nC-Gq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:26:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4A24F043.60007@mayc.ru> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:26:27 +0400 From: Anton D Kachalov MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Killing KQEMU References: <20090602035217.GA16574@foursquare.net> In-Reply-To: <20090602035217.GA16574@foursquare.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Chris Frey Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 02.06.2009 07:52, Chris Frey wrote: > Hi, > > I feel that I should post here, for the simple reason that most QEMU > users likely don't read this list, and have no idea that developers are > striving to kill off a valued feature. > [...] Chris, I may suggest you to switch to VirtualBox / VirtualBox OSE that has more features (comparable to VmWare) if you're interested to use QEMU just to run some kind of OS. It's much faster than QEMU + kqemu. And more over, it's stable. Sometimes I have software fails (segfaults in Java JIT) with QEMU+kqemu, but VBox drives well. If you're HW/FW developer, you doesn't need kqemu at all. Rgds, Anton