From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MByTG-0003R2-L7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:58:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MByTC-0003O2-07 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:58:06 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50315 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MByTB-0003Nu-Pv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:58:01 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.153]:34395) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MByTB-0001GO-6x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:58:01 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so102594fga.8 for ; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A26F1E3.1040509@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:57:55 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] POLL: Why do you use kqemu? List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" I'm curious to know who all out there is using kqemu and why they are using it. Please take a moment to fill out the following poll if you use kqemu. Having actual data as to why people are using kqemu may help figure out the best way to replace it in the future. http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpview/604126-172373 I'll post the results in a few weeks. Thanks, Anthony Liguori