From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MCU7e-0003Dt-U2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:45:54 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MCU7Z-0003DY-Fr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:45:53 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55309 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MCU7Z-0003DV-Av
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:45:49 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:50907)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1MCU7Y-0006Wa-Fr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:45:48 -0400
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1MCU7S-0007nX-0h
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:45:42 -0400
Message-ID: <4A28CD17.4050107@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:45:27 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] POLL: Why do you use kqemu?
References: <4A26F1E3.1040509@codemonkey.ws> <4A27FC69.9070501@mayc.ru>
	<alpine.DEB.1.00.0906050243140.26154@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0906050243140.26154@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Anton D Kachalov <mouse@mayc.ru>

On 06/05/09 02:44, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Anton D Kachalov wrote:
>
>> There is one point missed: "I do not use kqemu". Just to have statistics
>> weight for the other side.
>
> I think that is totally beside the point.  The question is if it is worth
> to continue to support kqemu.  And frankly, for that I could not care less
> if there are people _not_ using kqemu if there are enough that _do_ use
> kqemu to merit a continuation.

A poll for both users and non-users would make sense IMHO.  It should 
include reasons for both groups though, i.e. like this:

I use kqemu because:
   [ ] old hardware
   [ ] *BSD host
   ....

I don't use kqemu because:
   [ ] using kvm instead
   [ ] using virtualbox instead
   [ ] doesn't work stable for me
   ...

cheers,
   Gerd