From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MCyLP-0001qj-G7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2009 12:02:07 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MCyLK-0001oR-Kp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2009 12:02:06 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42884 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MCyLK-0001o6-7U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2009 12:02:02 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:41437) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MCyLJ-0004QC-HW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2009 12:02:01 -0400 Message-ID: <4A2A92FE.2010700@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 19:02:06 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] POLL: Why do you use kqemu? References: <4A26F1E3.1040509@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Andreas F=E4rber wrote: > Or as another example, I've been unable to try KVM with svn/git QEMU=20 > because new capability defines keep being added that block compiling=20 > QEMU with KVM from any mainstream distribution. With nobody here being=20 > able to recommend a working distribution, that makes KVM a moot=20 > alternative, especially on systems you can't install your own kernel=20 > modules on. I just hope that Fedora 11 will let me try it. Try qemu-kvm.git, that should compile and run on almost anything (and is=20 a lot faster and more featureful than kvm support in qemu.git). --=20 I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.