From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MDIXH-0003tb-GF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2009 09:35:43 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MDIXB-0003lY-4V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2009 09:35:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48375 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MDIXA-0003l9-QS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2009 09:35:36 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:37494) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MDIXA-0003li-As for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2009 09:35:36 -0400 Message-ID: <4A2BC220.6090908@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:35:28 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: POLL: Why do you use kqemu? References: <4A2A92FE.2010700@redhat.com> <4A2B7F5E.8050807@web.de> <4A2B8787.5080603@web.de> <20090607112325.GD29048@redhat.com> <4A2BA708.4070004@redhat.com> <4A2BB5FE.3000301@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , Jan Kiszka , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Gleb Natapov Blue Swirl wrote: > I found a bug in configure, if there are targets that can't use KVM, > it is disabled for all targets. > Yes. kvm support should be an array, not a scalar. Note we shouldn't even attempt kvm if the host and target don't match. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.