From: Uri Lublin <uril@redhat.com>
To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migrate_fd_close: delete associated io-handler before closing the fd
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:02:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2D4421.4020206@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244479094.3632.60.camel@blaa>
On 06/08/2009 07:38 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
> Would the below patch working equally well? But then again, we should
> really remove the I/O handler before closing the fd.
I think it should work too.
My patch does remove the I/O handler before closing the fd.
>
> (The close(s->fd) in migration_fd_cleanup() looks like it can never
> happen - perhaps we should remove it)
Perhaps we should. I think it's like a "plan b" in case qemu_fclose did not
actually closed the file descriptor (which, as you mentioned, currently, can
never happen).
> diff --git a/migration.c b/migration.c
> index 401383c..078967f 100644
> --- a/migration.c
> +++ b/migration.c
> @@ -154,13 +154,21 @@ void migrate_fd_error(FdMigrationState *s)
>
> void migrate_fd_cleanup(FdMigrationState *s)
> {
> - qemu_set_fd_handler2(s->fd, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
Would it be safer to keep the I/O handler deletion before the call to
qemu_fclose (in addition to adding the one below), or it does not matter.
> + int fd;
> +
> + /* qemu_fclose() can cause I/O to be flushed (see buffered_close())
> + * which, in turn, can cause an I/O handler to be registered. We
> + * need to delay removing the I/O handler until after qemu_fclose().
> + */
> + fd = s->fd;
>
> if (s->file) {
> dprintf("closing file\n");
> qemu_fclose(s->file);
> }
>
> + qemu_set_fd_handler2(fd, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> +
> if (s->fd != -1)
> close(s->fd);
>
>
Regards,
Uri.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-08 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-08 11:28 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migrate_fd_close: delete associated io-handler before closing the fd Uri Lublin
2009-06-08 15:49 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-06-08 15:56 ` Uri Lublin
2009-06-08 16:38 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-06-08 17:02 ` Uri Lublin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A2D4421.4020206@redhat.com \
--to=uril@redhat.com \
--cc=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).