From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MDkMK-0003T0-Uv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:18:16 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MDkMF-0003Rg-F3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:18:15 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50976 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MDkMF-0003Rd-9w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:18:11 -0400 Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.148]:26615) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MDkMF-0008Sa-2H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:18:11 -0400 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so1677651qwk.4 for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:18:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A2D63EC.9040003@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:18:04 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] virtio-net: Add new RX filter controls References: <20090605204647.3355.81929.stgit@kvm.aw> <20090605204718.3355.28647.stgit@kvm.aw> <20090606204845.GC26877@redhat.com> <7162ab20906081201y4c598899mdfd5d42c42e17038@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7162ab20906081201y4c598899mdfd5d42c42e17038@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alex Williamson Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" Alex Williamson wrote: > e1000 also allows the driver to selectively enable/disable RX of > packets to the broadcast address. This is replicated with the > all/no-bcast options. Finally, there may be cases where we want to > receive only unicast or only multicast address for special purpose > network devices. This is provided by the nouni and nomulti options. > A proprietary guest know as DMX intends to make use of these extra > modes. Are there any other interesting, useful and lightweight packet > filters we could implement? Thanks, > I've been thinking about whether doing VLAN filtering/tagging within QEMU would make sense. It could potentially simplify bridge setups tremendously. Today, if you want to isolate VMs on separate vlans, it involves creating multiple bridges which gets ugly quickly. Of course, for that to be useful, it should happen at the generic networking layer in QEMU, not specific to virtio-net. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Alex > > >