From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2] Apic creation should not depend on pci
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:37:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2E1F61.6040406@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090609081401.GR27210@redhat.com>
Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 04:03:19PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>>
>>> It should depend on whether cpu has APIC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
>>> diff --git a/hw/pc.c b/hw/pc.c
>>> index 0934778..cb49772 100644
>>> --- a/hw/pc.c
>>> +++ b/hw/pc.c
>>> @@ -878,14 +878,10 @@ static void pc_init1(ram_addr_t ram_size,
>>> }
>>> if (i != 0)
>>> env->halted = 1;
>>> - if (smp_cpus > 1) {
>>> - /* XXX: enable it in all cases */
>>> - env->cpuid_features |= CPUID_APIC;
>>> - }
>>> - qemu_register_reset(main_cpu_reset, 0, env);
>>> - if (pci_enabled) {
>>> + if ((env->cpuid_features & CPUID_APIC) || smp_cpus > 1) {
>> Obviously :), I'm fine with that change. Needs testing, though. What
>> scenarios did you already check?
>>
>>> apic_init(env);
>>> }
>>> + qemu_register_reset(main_cpu_reset, 0, env);
>> But this line silently reorders CPU and APIC reset handlers. If you did
>> it intentionally (I vaguely recall it may have some benefit /wrt KVM
>> synchronizing kernel and user space states), I would suggest pushing it
>> as a separate patch.
>>
> BTW relying on order of callback registration is not a good idea
> especially since we have "order" parameter now.
The order parameter is obsolete, I already posted a patch to revert this
idea again (reminds me of posting an update as a new reset handler
arrived in the meantime).
The system-wide assumed and applied order is that earlier instantiated
devices will be reset first. That specifically makes sense if you think
of bus/device relations.
> On the other hand apic
> reset handler already resets cpu so if apic is present there is no need to
> register main_cpu_reset().
OK, this is a special case as the APIC reset triggers an init IPI and
that resets the CPU, too. Then make this explicit, replace
main_cpu_reset with cpu_reset (so that no one adds code to the former
that is not run in the APIC case) and add some comment why.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-09 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-08 12:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] Apic creation should not depend on pci Gleb Natapov
2009-06-08 14:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2009-06-08 14:06 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-06-09 8:14 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-06-09 8:37 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2009-06-09 8:54 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A2E1F61.6040406@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).