From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGCBL-0006Lk-Qk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:25:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGCBH-0006Jc-03 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:25:02 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50025 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MGCBG-0006JU-PR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:24:58 -0400 Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.150]:13996) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MGCBG-0003eF-7u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:24:58 -0400 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so1782615qwk.4 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A364BA6.7050708@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:24:54 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Configuration vs. compat hints [was Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 03/13] qemu: add routines to manage PCI capabilities] References: <20090610145540.GI19375@poweredge.glommer> <20090610150129.GC28601@redhat.com> <200906101624.30659.paul@codesourcery.com> <20090610174301.GC7416@shareable.org> <20090610182227.GN28601@redhat.com> <20090610192702.GH7416@shareable.org> <1244796209.16425.20.camel@blaa> <4A326C7E.3020309@codemonkey.ws> <1244822007.30522.68.camel@blaa> <4A327E87.6080005@codemonkey.ws> <1244825333.26769.20.camel@blaa> <4A34ADA9.80709@redhat.com> <1245056955.6891.33.camel@blaa> <4A36314A.8040206@redhat.com> <4A364316.5070402@codemonkey.ws> <4A3648BE.2050403@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4A3648BE.2050403@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Carsten Otte , Rusty Russell , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Mark McLoughlin , Glauber Costa , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Blue Swirl , Christian Borntraeger , Paul Brook Avi Kivity wrote: > > Certainly preferable to -baseline. > >> This is pretty easy to maintain with config files. > > Let's not tie the two together. I mentioned it because it suggests a good transition. We at least have to think through how things map to the post-config file world regardless of whether that's a few months from now or a decade :-) Regards, Anthony Liguori