From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGCtr-0002lA-Hu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:11:04 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGCtk-0002h2-Dh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:11:01 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40848 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MGCtj-0002gn-V0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:10:56 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:35844) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MGCW3-0007sc-NX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:46:28 -0400 Message-ID: <4A365019.9010705@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:43:53 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Configuration vs. compat hints [was Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 03/13] qemu: add routines to manage PCI capabilities] References: <20090610145540.GI19375@poweredge.glommer> <20090610150129.GC28601@redhat.com> <200906101624.30659.paul@codesourcery.com> <20090610174301.GC7416@shareable.org> <20090610182227.GN28601@redhat.com> <20090610192702.GH7416@shareable.org> <1244796209.16425.20.camel@blaa> <4A326C7E.3020309@codemonkey.ws> <1244822007.30522.68.camel@blaa> <4A327E87.6080005@codemonkey.ws> <1244825333.26769.20.camel@blaa> <4A34ADA9.80709@redhat.com> <1245056955.6891.33.camel@blaa> <4A36314A.8040206@redhat.com> <4A364316.5070402@codemonkey.ws> <4A3648BE.2050403@redhat.com> <4A364BA6.7050708@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4A364BA6.7050708@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Carsten Otte , Rusty Russell , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Mark McLoughlin , Glauber Costa , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Blue Swirl , Christian Borntraeger , Paul Brook On 06/15/2009 04:24 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: >> >> Certainly preferable to -baseline. >> >>> This is pretty easy to maintain with config files. >> >> Let's not tie the two together. > > I mentioned it because it suggests a good transition. We at least > have to think through how things map to the post-config file world > regardless of whether that's a few months from now or a decade :-) Sure, it's good both from the transitional point of view and in its own right. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function