From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MH0jV-00081s-VG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:23:41 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MH0jR-0007zF-1G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:23:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59586 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MH0jQ-0007zC-Ua for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:23:36 -0400 Received: from kazon.borderworlds.dk ([213.239.213.48]:60431) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MH0jQ-00054Y-JP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:23:36 -0400 Received: from talaxian.borderworlds.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kazon.borderworlds.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A0C17091 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:23:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A3942B5.10200@borderworlds.dk> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:23:33 +0200 From: Christian Laursen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] kqemu poll results References: <4A393D05.80609@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4A393D05.80609@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Anthony Liguori wrote: > http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpresult/604126-172373 > > Surprisingly, BSD host seems to be a dominating factor. Until a few days ago, qemu+kqemu was the only practical way to run a virtual machine on FreeBSD. Virtualbox has just been committed to ports and a number of users will probably switch to using that now. Personally I would prefer qemu+kvm if there was a FreeBSD port of kvm. I probably lack both the time and skills to help with that. :( -- Christian Laursen