From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MHfp8-0006pI-Ef
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:16:14 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MHfp3-0006p6-38
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:16:13 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33582 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHfp2-0006p3-UO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:16:08 -0400
Received: from mail-ew0-f220.google.com ([209.85.219.220]:36248)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1MHfp2-0001jz-EF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:16:08 -0400
Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so2048544ewy.34
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A3BABB1.6060708@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:16:01 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] sending pci information over the wire
References: <20090618193946.GH3517@poweredge.glommer>
	<4A3A9D89.5000305@codemonkey.ws>
	<20090618201227.GI3517@poweredge.glommer>
	<4A3AA5D8.8050303@codemonkey.ws> <4A3B527C.2010203@redhat.com>
	<4A3B8E56.3040903@codemonkey.ws> <4A3BA1C6.6040701@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A3BA1C6.6040701@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com

Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> I think something
>> we could do better is avoiding losing track of patches though. I'm
>> working on that.
>
> Related issues:  Looks like the qemu-commits list is lossy.  I havn't 
> seen messages for my two most recent vnc patches.  I figured while 
> rebasing the vnc patches because git surprised me with "nothing to 
> do".  Also it seems for merges only a message for the merge commit 
> goes to the list, not for the individual patches.

With respect to merge commits, it wouldn't surprise me.

There is a certain amount of lossy-ness to qemu-commits because our 
internal SMTP servers frequently like to go down.  It's a git commit 
hook so having a mechanism to retry later would be overly complicated.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> cheers,
>   Gerd