From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MI5ll-00053d-9e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:58:29 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MI5lg-0004yp-D2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:58:28 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36142 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MI5lf-0004yW-Vr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:58:24 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:33517) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MI5lf-0008F5-Fm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:58:23 -0400 Message-ID: <4A3D3155.10802@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:58:29 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] sending pci information over the wire References: <20090618193946.GH3517@poweredge.glommer> <4A3A9D89.5000305@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4A3A9D89.5000305@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Glauber Costa , kraxel@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 06/18/2009 11:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Once we have a machine config (and please, let's avoid the 2017 jokes > please), I imagine that the machine config will be transferred as a > non-live section. What exactly do you propose to send? the machine config file, or an internal representation thereof? We already have the internal representation in the form of the qdev tree. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.