From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MI622-0000ky-Am for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:15:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MI61x-0000hz-LA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:15:17 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50209 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MI61x-0000ho-Gq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:15:13 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:38869) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MI61x-0003oT-3J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:15:13 -0400 Message-ID: <4A3D3546.1050407@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:15:18 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] replace O_SYNC with O_FSYNC References: <10665282192-BeMail@laptop> In-Reply-To: <10665282192-BeMail@laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?RnJhbsOnb2lzIFJldm9s?= Cc: programmingkidx@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 06/20/2009 10:03 PM, Fran=C3=A7ois Revol wrote: >> On 06/20/2009 05:31 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> =20 >>> Please include a Signed-off-by line and use C-style comments >>> instead >>> of C++ style comments. Otherwise, looks good. >>> =20 >> What do we have against C++ style comments? >> =20 > > They are not valid in C code :P > =20 I think C99 allows them. Too bad date-related jokes are forbidden. --=20 I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.