qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block-raw: Make cache=off default again
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:44:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A3F6EA3.2010303@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090622113524.GA13583@lst.de>

Christoph Hellwig schrieb:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 01:18:03PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Since the patch that suggested it woudl revert qcow2 to writeback caching, in
>> fact none of the drivers has had cache=off as default any more. This patch
>> restores the desired behaviour.
> 
> Looks good to me.  I still quite hate that BDRV_O_CACHE_DEF thing, just
> makes it too complicated for drivers to get it right.

Actually it's just raw that must get it right. All the other drivers
access their image file through raw.

> Btw, what is the performance for qcow2 without write-back caching with
> all your improvements?

I haven't done real benchmarks for some time, but my simple test cases
like "run mke2fs on an empty image" have shown great improvement (at
least on IDE, for virtio I haven't understood yet what influences the
size of its requests - you should have received a private mail from Dor
about this). Possibly we could even enable cache=off for qcow2 now.

IIUC, you have a nice setup to measure block performance now. Maybe
you'd like to let it run with qcow2 and cache=wb/none?

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-22 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-22 11:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block-raw: Make cache=off default again Kevin Wolf
2009-06-22 11:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-22 11:44   ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2009-06-22 11:55     ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-22 12:32       ` Kevin Wolf
2009-06-22 12:39         ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-22 12:50           ` Kevin Wolf
2009-06-23 10:30             ` Jamie Lokier
2009-06-23 11:46               ` Kevin Wolf
2009-06-24 21:23                 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-06-25  7:31                   ` Kevin Wolf
2009-06-22 13:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-22 13:05       ` Kevin Wolf
2009-06-22 13:14       ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-22 13:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-06-22 13:20   ` Kevin Wolf
2009-06-22 14:00     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-06-22 13:23   ` Dor Laor
2009-06-22 13:29     ` Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A3F6EA3.2010303@redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).