From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MIqzh-0001wB-Fq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:24:01 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MIqzc-0001m2-MQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:24:00 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55007 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MIqzc-0001lj-IL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:23:56 -0400 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:51173) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MIqzc-0006lz-AA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:23:56 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5MLIfhf013537 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:18:41 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n5MLNogW243320 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:23:50 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n5MLNoLj003351 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:23:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4A3FF663.6040209@us.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:23:47 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] State of sparc64-softmmu List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Cc: Blue Swirl , Dustin Kirkland Hi, I noticed that sparc64-softmmu's build is broken in the latest git. The reason for this is that the default --target-list doesn't include sparc64-softmmu so it's getting through my compile tests. But this leads me to wonder, is this just an oversite or is there something wrong with sparc64-softmmu that we don't recommend building it by default? -- Regards, Anthony Liguori