From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJ4JI-0002Z3-AA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:37:08 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJ4JD-0002WU-Er for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:37:07 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42169 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJ4JC-0002Vp-EU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:37:02 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:42690) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MJ4JA-0006DA-7Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:37:00 -0400 Message-ID: <4A40BE90.4040709@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:37:52 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20090623100009.827553739@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20090623100009.827553739@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [patch 0/2] QEMU maxcpus support List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jes Sorensen Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 06/23/2009 01:00 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: > Hi, > > This patch set adds the -maxcpus argument to QEMU and provides the > needed patches to the BOCHS patch queue to make the BIOS use it. > > Specifying -maxcpus allows the user to cap the limit of possibly cpus > of the system, as opposed to -smp which specifies the number of > running cpus at startup. This allows us to build BIOS tables > accordingly when trying to scale up in size, and it also allows for > the BIOS to build smaller tables when not needed. > > I am going to submit a set of patches directly for BOCHS as well > covering the BIOS part, but I am still waiting for my bochs-developers > subscription to be enabled. > > Avi asked me to post this both for QEMU and the BIOS part for BOCHS. > I should have said this at your previous post, but it only occurred to me now: we could have -smp 4,maxcpus=65536 instead of a new parameter. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function