From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJ68g-0006OX-Jp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:34:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJ68c-0006Il-Jj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:34:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44864 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJ68c-0006Ig-GD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:34:14 -0400 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.179.30]:34602 helo=relay.sgi.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MJ68c-0002BP-6m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:34:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4A40D965.7010508@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:32:21 +0200 From: Jes Sorensen MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20090623100009.827553739@sgi.com> <4A40BE90.4040709@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4A40BE90.4040709@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [patch 0/2] QEMU maxcpus support List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 06/23/2009 01:37 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 06/23/2009 01:00 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> Avi asked me to post this both for QEMU and the BIOS part for BOCHS. > > I should have said this at your previous post, but it only occurred to > me now: we could have -smp 4,maxcpus=65536 instead of a new parameter. > We could do that too, but is it really worth it? It seems to me -maxcpus is fine? Cheers, Jes