From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJ6AD-0007On-Rb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:35:53 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJ6A9-0007Kf-2X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:35:53 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44892 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJ6A8-0007KH-MP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:35:48 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:53390) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MJ6A8-0002Y0-89 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:35:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4A40DA69.7010300@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:36:41 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20090623100009.827553739@sgi.com> <4A40BE90.4040709@redhat.com> <4A40D965.7010508@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <4A40D965.7010508@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [patch 0/2] QEMU maxcpus support List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jes Sorensen Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 06/23/2009 04:32 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> I should have said this at your previous post, but it only occurred to >> me now: we could have -smp 4,maxcpus=65536 instead of a new parameter. >> > > > We could do that too, but is it really worth it? It seems to me -maxcpus > is fine? The trend is to consolidate related options into a single option, -to -avoid -command -lines -with -too -many -dashes. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function