>From 8e2e406e1220f9eedb042919c431c963af1433e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dor Laor <dor@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 00:22:28 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] Call missing qemu_bh_delete at the end of raw_aio_em_cb callback. Without it, these cb's does not get cleaned and it slows down qemu more and more. (to test, the # of bh->next chain is huge when using cache=off). Thanks Avi for helping with the debug. Signed-off-by: Dor Laor <dor@redhat.com> --- block-raw-posix.c | 17 +++++++++++------ 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/block-raw-posix.c b/block-raw-posix.c index 85ca704..8fce9e6 100644 --- a/block-raw-posix.c +++ b/block-raw-posix.c @@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ typedef struct RawAIOCB { BlockDriverAIOCB common; struct qemu_paiocb aiocb; struct RawAIOCB *next; + QEMUBH *bh; int ret; } RawAIOCB; @@ -593,6 +594,8 @@ static void raw_aio_em_cb(void* opaque) { RawAIOCB *acb = opaque; acb->common.cb(acb->common.opaque, acb->ret); + qemu_bh_delete(acb->bh); + acb->bh = NULL; qemu_aio_release(acb); } @@ -628,11 +631,12 @@ static BlockDriverAIOCB *raw_aio_read(BlockDriverState *bs, BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque; if (unlikely(s->aligned_buf != NULL && ((uintptr_t) buf % 512))) { - QEMUBH *bh; acb = qemu_aio_get(bs, cb, opaque); acb->ret = raw_pread(bs, 512 * sector_num, buf, 512 * nb_sectors); - bh = qemu_bh_new(raw_aio_em_cb, acb); - qemu_bh_schedule(bh); + acb->bh = qemu_bh_new(raw_aio_em_cb, acb); + if (!acb->bh) + return NULL; + qemu_bh_schedule(acb->bh); return &acb->common; } @@ -659,11 +663,12 @@ static BlockDriverAIOCB *raw_aio_write(BlockDriverState *bs, BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque; if (unlikely(s->aligned_buf != NULL && ((uintptr_t) buf % 512))) { - QEMUBH *bh; acb = qemu_aio_get(bs, cb, opaque); acb->ret = raw_pwrite(bs, 512 * sector_num, buf, 512 * nb_sectors); - bh = qemu_bh_new(raw_aio_em_cb, acb); - qemu_bh_schedule(bh); + acb->bh = qemu_bh_new(raw_aio_em_cb, acb); + if (!acb->bh) + return NULL; + qemu_bh_schedule(acb->bh); return &acb->common; }-- 1.5.6.6