From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MLeNb-00077B-27 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:32:15 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MLeNV-00074j-Rr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:32:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60550 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MLeNV-00074Y-FN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:32:09 -0400 Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.139]:56576) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MLeNV-0001DD-1W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:32:09 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e9.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5UEJjsd016921 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:19:45 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n5UEW51f231000 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:32:05 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n5UEW52B009909 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:32:05 -0400 Message-ID: <4A4A21E3.5060802@us.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:32:03 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4A49D641.6000206@siemens.com> <4A49DA07.5070905@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Xen build broken with current git head List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juan Quintela Cc: Jan Kiszka , Gerd Hoffmann , qemu-devel Juan Quintela wrote: > Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > >> On 06/30/09 11:09, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >>> FYI (sorry, no time to dig into this). >>> >> Noticed too. Looks like it tries to build xen on arm now, then fails >> to link. I suspect it's somewhere in the Makefile changes. >> > > Anthony, please apply. > It compiles for me now. > Could you send as proper patch? I'll push it immediately. -- Regards, Anthony Liguori