From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] qdev/core: bus list
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:49:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A4A6C48.3060101@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ab3p7cbh.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org>
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
>
>> On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>
>>> Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> * maintain a list of busses.
>>>>> * maintain bus numbers.
>>>>> * add function to find busses by type / name / number.
>>>>> * add monitor command to list busses.
>>>>>
>>>> I still object to this patch. Busses should be identified by their
>>>> location in the tree, not by number.
>>>>
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>> Location in the tree can be uniquely identified by a number. Handy when
>>> all you want is enumerate the buses, and you don't really care where
>>> they're hanging out in the tree. Why should something like that not be
>>> done?
>>>
>> The address of the BusState is also a locally unique identifier. That doesn't
>> mean it's a good thing to expose to the user.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>
> Red herring.
>
I don't think that's a very useful response.
I think it's a perfectly valid suggestion that we should identify buses
based on the their location in the tree to users verses a number
generated based on some hashing algorithm.
A tree location has meaning to a user. A random integer doesn't.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-30 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-30 9:25 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] qdev patches, batch #1 Gerd Hoffmann
2009-06-30 9:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/8] qdev: update pci device registration Gerd Hoffmann
2009-06-30 9:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/8] qdev: replace bus_type enum with bus_info struct Gerd Hoffmann
2009-06-30 9:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/8] qdev: remove DeviceType Gerd Hoffmann
2009-06-30 9:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] qdev/core: bus list Gerd Hoffmann
2009-06-30 11:18 ` Paul Brook
2009-06-30 16:55 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-06-30 17:21 ` Paul Brook
2009-06-30 19:26 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-06-30 19:49 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-06-30 20:18 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-06-30 20:36 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-01 0:25 ` Paul Brook
2009-07-01 6:32 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-07-01 0:12 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-07-01 0:29 ` Paul Brook
2009-06-30 9:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] qdev/core: add monitor command to list all drivers Gerd Hoffmann
2009-06-30 9:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] qdev/pci: misc fixes Gerd Hoffmann
2009-06-30 11:25 ` Paul Brook
2009-06-30 16:51 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-06-30 9:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/8] qdev: convert es1370 Gerd Hoffmann
2009-06-30 9:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/8] qdev: convert ac97 Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A4A6C48.3060101@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).