qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Qemu-devel] Disabling kqemu by default at runtime for 0.11
@ 2009-07-09 21:04 Anthony Liguori
  2009-07-09 22:14 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paul Brook
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2009-07-09 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; +Cc: Paul Brook

We've talked about this at length but I'd like to pull the trigger.  The 
user-visible change would be that -enable-kqemu would be required to 
explicitly request kqemu support instead of enabling it by default.  
kqemu would still be enabled by default at build time.

Do you object to this Paul?

-- 
Regards,

Anthony Liguori

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] Re: Disabling kqemu by default at runtime for 0.11
  2009-07-09 21:04 [Qemu-devel] Disabling kqemu by default at runtime for 0.11 Anthony Liguori
@ 2009-07-09 22:14 ` Paul Brook
  2009-07-09 22:29   ` Anthony Liguori
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Brook @ 2009-07-09 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anthony Liguori; +Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thursday 09 July 2009, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> We've talked about this at length but I'd like to pull the trigger.  The
> user-visible change would be that -enable-kqemu would be required to
> explicitly request kqemu support instead of enabling it by default.
> kqemu would still be enabled by default at build time.
>
> Do you object to this Paul?

i have no objection to disabling kqemu by default *at runtime*. This would 
make it the same as kvm.

On principle I object to having code that is disabled by default at configure 
time. IMO that code should either be removed or fixed. If we were to disable 
kqemu at configure time for 0.11 then I would expect to remove the code from 
trunk shortly after 0.11 was released.

Paul

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Disabling kqemu by default at runtime for 0.11
  2009-07-09 22:14 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paul Brook
@ 2009-07-09 22:29   ` Anthony Liguori
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2009-07-09 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Brook; +Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Paul Brook wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
>> We've talked about this at length but I'd like to pull the trigger.  The
>> user-visible change would be that -enable-kqemu would be required to
>> explicitly request kqemu support instead of enabling it by default.
>> kqemu would still be enabled by default at build time.
>>
>> Do you object to this Paul?
>>     
>
> i have no objection to disabling kqemu by default *at runtime*. This would 
> make it the same as kvm.
>
> On principle I object to having code that is disabled by default at configure 
> time. IMO that code should either be removed or fixed. If we were to disable 
> kqemu at configure time for 0.11 then I would expect to remove the code from 
> trunk shortly after 0.11 was released.
>   

I've left kqemu enabled in the build but just defaulted it to off at 
runtime.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Paul
>
>
>   

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-09 22:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-09 21:04 [Qemu-devel] Disabling kqemu by default at runtime for 0.11 Anthony Liguori
2009-07-09 22:14 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paul Brook
2009-07-09 22:29   ` Anthony Liguori

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).