From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MPFhf-0003Si-7U
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:59:51 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MPFha-0003L5-EO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:59:50 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57888 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MPFha-0003Kt-9M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:59:46 -0400
Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.144]:62089)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1MPFhZ-0000s7-Sd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:59:45 -0400
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so260130qwc.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:59:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A573B3F.1010900@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:59:43 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] use uint32_t for ioport port and value
	instead of int.
References: <1246530731-14597-1-git-send-email-yamahata@valinux.co.jp>	<1246530731-14597-7-git-send-email-yamahata@valinux.co.jp>	<4A564003.5080707@codemonkey.ws>	<20090710082121.GB5471@const.bordeaux.inria.fr>	<20090710084508.GM12665%yamahata@valinux.co.jp>	<20090710085434.GK5471@const.bordeaux.inria.fr>
	<A7081921-1E85-4C19-8DFE-AE962B139E44@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <A7081921-1E85-4C19-8DFE-AE962B139E44@adacore.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
Cc: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
> On Jul 10, 2009, at 10:54 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
>> Isaku Yamahata, le Fri 10 Jul 2009 17:45:08 +0900, a écrit :
>>> void cpu_out[bwl](CPUState *env, int64_t addr, int{8, 16, 32}_t val);
>>
>> uint16_t addr, and uint* for val
>>
>>> uint{8, 16, 32}_t cpu_inw(CPUState *env, int16_t addr);
>>
>> uint16_t addr
>
> Some machines allow more than 2**16 ports (guess which :-)

But I thought that PIO on ia64 ended up being MMIO or something funky 
like that?  Would it really end up using this code path?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori