From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MPJ2H-0006aV-SS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:33:21 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MPJ2D-0006UH-Ny for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:33:21 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44588 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MPJ2D-0006TX-9k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:33:17 -0400 Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.160]:39927) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MPJ2C-000307-Tc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:33:17 -0400 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e39.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6AGSmw6024225 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:28:48 -0600 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n6AGXFnp225936 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:33:15 -0600 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n6AGXE4T019095 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:33:14 -0600 Message-ID: <4A576D49.40809@us.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:33:13 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Planning for the 0.11.0 release References: <4A401A65.3080804@us.ibm.com> <1247128021.22231.1.camel@blaa> <4A55F150.3020803@codemonkey.ws> <87eisp1gx2.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> <4A5747E4.3030101@us.ibm.com> <4A57586B.9050900@siemens.com> <4A576317.6010000@us.ibm.com> <4A576AF6.6080307@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <4A576AF6.6080307@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Mark McLoughlin , Paul Brook , Markus Armbruster , kvm-devel , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Jan Kiszka wrote: > Ah, thanks. > > OK, then I would like to know the status of my -boot patch queue [1] I'm stilling waiting for 1/7 and 2/7. Via the link you posted and in my inbox, I still don't see those. I do see a 1/2 and a 2/2 but those are bios patches. Did you have a numbering issue or did some patches get lost in the ether? > and > at least of patch 1..3 of my gdbstub queue [2] (though I'm still waiting > for the factual proof that patch 4 is unneeded - my last arguments > remained unanswered). > Paul expressed objection in the past to the debugging model of treating vcpus as threads vs. treating them as processes. I'm not qualified to appreciate the difference so I'm inclined to side with Paul. Am I missing something there? -- Regards, Anthony Liguori