From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MPJfa-0003im-A2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:13:58 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MPJfV-0003fm-6O
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:13:57 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49683 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MPJfV-0003fY-3D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:13:53 -0400
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:35727)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1MPJfU-00039G-Gi
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:13:52 -0400
Message-ID: <4A577685.30103@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:12:37 +0200
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Planning for the 0.11.0 release
References: <4A401A65.3080804@us.ibm.com> <1247128021.22231.1.camel@blaa>
	<4A55F150.3020803@codemonkey.ws> <87eisp1gx2.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org>
	<4A5747E4.3030101@us.ibm.com> <4A57586B.9050900@siemens.com>
	<4A576317.6010000@us.ibm.com> <4A577291.4000206@redhat.com>
	<4A57736D.6040708@codemonkey.ws> <20090710171019.GA5014@lst.de>
In-Reply-To: <20090710171019.GA5014@lst.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>

Christoph Hellwig schrieb:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:59:25AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> If I'm not mistaken, the patch "qemu-io: Implement
>>> bdrv_get_buffer/bdrv_put_buffer" is missing from the queue.
>>>  
>> I just did a pull a few hours ago from Christoph's qemu-io tree.  I'm 
>> expecting qemu-io patches to go through his tree.
> 
> I hold that patch back for now as it will need a bit of work if
> the ->bdrv_{get,put}_buffer renaming patch goes in.

Ok, that makes sense. Will you take care of it once the renaming patch
is in or should I resend it then?

Kevin