From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MPJqi-0000Ef-R2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:25:28 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MPJqe-00007S-CF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:25:28 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33189 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MPJqd-000074-VH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:25:24 -0400 Received: from mail-px0-f201.google.com ([209.85.216.201]:46075) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MPJqd-0005w4-Jj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:25:23 -0400 Received: by pxi39 with SMTP id 39so647197pxi.4 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:25:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A57797E.2010603@codemonkey.ws> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:25:18 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] slirp: Fix default netmask to 255.255.255.0 References: <4A4CD24E.1090309@siemens.com> <4A577758.8010607@codemonkey.ws> <4A57786E.30200@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <4A57786E.30200@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel , Avi Kivity Jan Kiszka wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >>> This got broken between a13a4126c8 and c92ef6a22d: old slirp code used >>> 255.255.255.0. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka >>> >>> >> I don't understand why, but this changeset breaks -net user for me. I get: >> >> x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -hda ~/images/linux.img -snapshot -L >> ~/git/qemu/pc-bios >> qemu: Could not initialize device 'user' >> > > Weird, double-checking locally. Is linux.img raw or something else (you > know, that pending -snapshot breakage with raw image...)? > It's a qcow2 and I don't know what -snapshot breakage you're referring to. It's reproducible without -snapshot and reproducible directly on top of master (minus all the crap in staging). Regards, Anthony Liguori > Jan > >