From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MPJug-0005a5-VW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:29:35 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MPJub-0005Uh-UI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:29:34 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55238 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MPJub-0005UX-Oy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:29:29 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.221.174]:54635) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MPJub-0006jP-GE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:29:29 -0400 Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so823645qyk.4 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A577A75.6@codemonkey.ws> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:29:25 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Planning for the 0.11.0 release References: <4A401A65.3080804@us.ibm.com> <1247128021.22231.1.camel@blaa> <4A55F150.3020803@codemonkey.ws> <87eisp1gx2.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> <4A5747E4.3030101@us.ibm.com> <4A57586B.9050900@siemens.com> <4A576317.6010000@us.ibm.com> <4A577291.4000206@redhat.com> <4A57736D.6040708@codemonkey.ws> <20090710171019.GA5014@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20090710171019.GA5014@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Kevin Wolf , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , kvm-devel Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:59:25AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >>> If I'm not mistaken, the patch "qemu-io: Implement >>> bdrv_get_buffer/bdrv_put_buffer" is missing from the queue. >>> >>> >> I just did a pull a few hours ago from Christoph's qemu-io tree. I'm >> expecting qemu-io patches to go through his tree. >> > > I hold that patch back for now as it will need a bit of work if > the ->bdrv_{get,put}_buffer renaming patch goes in. Just looking at > the queue Anthony only has queued up the older non-renaming version. > Sorry, I'm not able to follow you here. What is currently queued and what do you think should be queued? Can you provide links/commit hashes? Regards, Anthony Liguori