From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Planning for the 0.11.0 release
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:58:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A578134.3020901@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907101840.55859.paul@codesourcery.com>
Paul Brook wrote:
>> Right, that part I'm okay with. But the vCont based gdb model presumes
>> a unified address space which while usually true for kernel address
>> spaces, isn't universally true and certainly not true when PC is in
>> userspace. That's what I understood to be the major objection to vCont.
>>
>
> The thread bits are the wrong way to do things, but are probably relatively
> harmless for now. Expect me to remove them at the first available opportunity.
>
I'll queue 1-3 then and we'll leave 4 for post-0.11 debate.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-10 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-22 23:57 [Qemu-devel] Planning for the 0.11.0 release Anthony Liguori
2009-06-23 12:12 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-23 15:09 ` Blue Swirl
2009-06-23 15:47 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-06-23 15:49 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-09 8:27 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-07-09 13:32 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 1:10 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-07-10 13:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 15:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-07-10 15:49 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 16:23 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-07-10 16:33 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 16:52 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-07-10 17:03 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 17:15 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-07-10 17:40 ` Paul Brook
2009-07-10 17:58 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-07-10 18:02 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-07-10 18:22 ` Paul Brook
2009-07-10 16:55 ` Kevin Wolf
2009-07-10 16:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 17:10 ` Kevin Wolf
2009-07-10 17:31 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 17:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-10 17:12 ` Kevin Wolf
2009-07-10 18:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-10 17:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 18:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-10 18:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 17:06 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-12 8:31 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A578134.3020901@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).