From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MPuQH-0007Rj-9e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:28:37 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MPuQC-0007RI-Dz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:28:36 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37904 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MPuQC-0007RF-9a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:28:32 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:57460) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MPuQB-0006X0-RW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:28:32 -0400 Message-ID: <4A599F5C.8040009@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 11:31:24 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Planning for the 0.11.0 release References: <4A401A65.3080804@us.ibm.com> <1247128021.22231.1.camel@blaa> <4A55F150.3020803@codemonkey.ws> <87eisp1gx2.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> <4A5747E4.3030101@us.ibm.com> <4A57586B.9050900@siemens.com> <4A576317.6010000@us.ibm.com> <4A577291.4000206@redhat.com> <4A57751E.3070005@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4A57751E.3070005@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Kevin Wolf , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , kvm-devel On 07/10/2009 08:06 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > BTW, this is one of the challenges of doing pulls. I did the pull and > then deleted every qemu-io patch in my queue since I assumed that > everything that should go in was part of hch's pull request. In > general, that's the only sane way to do pulls so if someone requests a > pull in the future, please make sure that you've gone through and > pulled any patch from the list first. Pulls and stale queues are incompatible. So long as everything is in patches, it doesn't matter since duplicate patches won't apply. However a branch can't be based on a queue (since that's liable to change any time), and the branch can't commit and patches in the queue (since the queue might be committed any time). If you want to pull, you'll need to shorten your queues (that will improve many other people's quality of life, btw). -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function